Is there a single most efficient way to write? Almost certainly not,
but for each individual, there’s likely a more efficient way than what they’re
currently doing. The following post will be primarily on
my own writing process, but perhaps some of this may be relatable or
instructive. My current process can be broken down into four common parts:
choosing a topic, deliberating on that topic, writing, and editing.
Choosing a topic is something I might go into more detail on another
day, but for now, the basics. My better ideas and “Aha” moments come into
existence when I’m not trying so hard to think of a topic. That can be when I’m
doing some low-effort task such as cooking, traveling, or any number of
relaxation-based activities. Reading is particularly useful since it sometimes
leads to what I’ll call the “I never thought of it like that” experience and
subsequent questions that arise from it. Another way I come up with topics is through collaboration and discussion which has been the case for the last several posts.
Deliberation on a topic, unlike selecting one, is more productive when I actively focused on it. Otherwise, this step can easily take up long lengths of
time. It tends to expand and contract in length between topic-discovery and, if
I let it, the deadline. This doesn’t mean more thinking. It means the same
amount of thinking spread out over a longer time period.
Writing begins when I’ve exhausted all possible excuses for delaying
the process. I sit down in my desk chair, open up a new document rather than
working directly in Blogger (Just a preference; I do the same for professional
emails), and begin with the first body paragraph. I skip writing the
introduction until later. If I run into an issue while writing, I make sure to
mark the problematic section for later editing. Admittedly, I try to finish the
rough draft as quickly as possible, but it’s not always a bad thing. When I
work quickly, I become immersed. I become focused on what I’m writing. It’s
when I sit back to smell the roses that my mind wanders off the task.
The editing process is where my work really starts to take shape. I
reread the sections that I previously struggled with, I shift things around, I
look for grammatical errors, and I take another look at the issues I’ve marked.
Once I’ve taken care of these major issues, I go to the beginning and start
reading. Every time I reach an issue, such as something that doesn’t flow very
well or something that doesn’t work in the big picture, I change it. Then I
reread the paragraph and make any more necessary changes. If I finish the
paragraph without any more issues, I move on to the next one. When I finish the first run through the post, assuming I’ve made a
few errors, I go back to the top of the post and start the whole process over.
It’s not until I can read the entire piece without issue that I consider my
work done. I honestly find this to be a tedious thing to do, especially for
longer work, but it’s effective for me.
On the other hand, my ideal process can be broken down into five common
parts: choosing a topic, deliberating on that topic, prewriting, writing, and
editing.
I’m not entirely satisfied with my current writing strategy. It’s
served me well through college, but now it’s time to find a better, more
consistent way. You may have noticed that prewriting wasn’t included in my
current process. In the past, I’ve utilized the tried-and-true outlining method
countless times as often required for class essays. For something so common and
obvious, you’d think I’d already be doing this for blogging. I’m not. At first glance,
it doesn’t take much to explain why; four steps to my process is less than
five.
Of course, that’s hardly a sufficient reason, but here’s the problem.
In the past, when an assignment called for an outline, I would obviously do it
and even overdo it. I’d format, underline, italicize, write in bold, and line
up all the bullet points. I’d use all the recommended sections and follow
essentially the right formula, but then I’d start the writing step and the whole process
would fall apart. For me, outlines would end in only one of two ways: either I
would end up ignoring my own outline throughout the writing process, or I would
follow through but see negligible changes in quality and time spent. Perhaps
the problem is that I haven’t committed enough to improving my prewriting
skills. Eventually, proper prewriting will likely save time. It may make the
five-step approach easier and faster than the four-step process.
I’m a little more okay with the other steps of my process. I’d like to
further explore choosing a topic. The inclusion of prewriting may radically
change my writing process, but I’m
pretty comfortable with my editing process. A few tweaks might help, though.
As it turns out, my attempt at prewriting for this very blog post was,
in a lot of ways, a failure. I fell into my first result category of outlining:
prewriting occurred, but I had trouble utilizing my own outline once writing
began. It wasn’t a total loss, though, because I stuck to certain
elements of my outline. Therefore, next week, I am committing to prewriting.
I hope readers can identify with what I’ve written here and analyze their own process. Maybe it’s better than mine (in fact, I’m confident it is), but one of the things I’ve learned lately is that everything in life, not just writing, is a process. Regardless of where you’re at or where you started, you can always end up at a far higher level of performance through practice. That being said, I’ll try and update my writing strategy. It could use some work.